The Diaperbag family.

We are the Diaperbag family. There are Jordan, Evan and Dylan (also known as Muffin) and they are fondly known as JED. We are their parents. Ondine and Packrat.

This is JED

Always playing or planning and plotting to take over the world. Always up to shenanigans.

This is Jordan, our first born

Actually she's part of a twin set. She was known as Twin 1 in-utero. She loves to draw what she dreams, dances what she draws.

This is Evan, reluctantly the younger twin

He's Twin 2 by two minutes because it took the doctor that long to find him. We don't think he'll ever forgive the doctor!

This is our youngest, Dylan (also known as Muffin)

He fancies himself the Lion King. His favourite activities are to climb, jump, pounce and roar at the world. The world is his Pride Rock.

Sunday, December 28, 2008

Battle of the Wills

I'm late on a Christmas post, I know. But Packrat needs to download the photos from his camera before I can get going on those ones. So I'll blog about something else first, which doesn't require photographic evidence. Food and eating or rather the lack there of.

We've come back from Vegas to kids who are a little bit different from the kids we left. They're a little bit more cognizant, a little bit more vocal, a little taller and chubbier and a whole lot more insistent on their ways. Call it asserting their independence.

Baby J has had the head start in that department since she was willful in-utero. But Evan is now a close second. Both know how to push and shove and know how to look offended and pout if told to NOT do something. And both have decidedly different outlooks and opinions about food. Evan will eat, almost anything and everything you put in front of him. But come milk time, he will purse his lips, clench his teeth and not let the teat through. I've resorted to tricking him into drinking milk by giving him cold fresh milk. But once the novelty of the cold sets in, he ignores it and runs away from the cup as soon as he catches sight of it. He'll drink his milk when he's going to bed, at night and during the night but nothing in the day. It can't be the milk because I've tried various things, breastmilk, formula, fresh milk, Pediasure. Even if we do eventually pin him down and get him to drink it, he'll drink less than half and he's off again. Part of me is concerned because the boy needs the calcium and despite him eating cheese and yogurt, it can't be enough. The other part of me thinks that he eats well, he drinks milk in the night, I survived on much less as a kid, I should be non-fazed.

Then there's Jordan, my little headstrong Baby Dowager who will let nary a piece meat into her mouth. She's always been a little bit more fussy and a little bit more picky as an eater but recently, she fights at every meal time. She has to be distracted for us to shovel food into her mouth. On good days she will take it and keep it down, on bad days she will go all bulimic on us and we'll see in it reverse projectile. Sometimes she cracks us up by being wise to our ways and suck dry the food we've spooned into her mouth and eject a dried up piece of cud devoid of juices. She is happy to drink plain soup, sans veg or meat and eat plain rice. Once again, that worries me and is grounds for contention between her other caregivers and I. Because she is my daughter and because I'm naturally and instinctively protective over her and because I feel that her temperament is mine, I tend to defend her against anyone who attacks her for it and feel hurt on her behalf when she is accused of a variety of things. I may be the over-protective mother here but who can stand by and watch her daughter be accused of being scheming, of being spoilt, of purposely angering her other caregivers? Who can fault the child when food has become such a big issue and if the girl is anything like me, when pushed into a corner, will push back and won't give in. I read everywhere that food should not be a battle ground. That we should not cause the child to associate food as a stressor.

But it really has become one. Between Baby J and her caregivers. Between her caregivers and I, unspoken of course. Often Baby J is cast in the role of the the conniving, spiteful one who does it on purpose to make the life of her caregiver miserable. That she plots, plans and occasionally throws up on people because she is battling with them. Unbeknowst or beknownst to those who make such accusations, it is often they, who portray her as such. At the same time, I know she can be trying and I have on many occasion, lost my patience with her sometimes to the point where I've had to leave the house or tell Packrat to take over. But I have never spoken in an unforgiving or resentful manner about my 18 month old.

And as with all allegedly guilty parties, when I feed Baby J today, she is good. She feeds herself rice, she eats her veg and meat (in small, non gag inducing quantities) and most of her soup. But come dinner, while I'm out running errands, she's back to being that 'naughty little girl' who will painstakingly remove every piece of meat from her mouth.

Of course, while all this is playing out, Evan seems to be the happy, cooperative child who eats his food, plays contentedly and is not an unfathomable mystery. Perhaps not and I'm thankful for his very easily lovable nature because I could never manage two difficult children, as is, with his milk strike and her food strike and petty tempers, it's more than I can handle. And while I am strong-willed, there's only that much I can battle, even with a battering ram.

If only they could invent an IV drip that we could attach our kids to, that would be great. We won't have to worry about nutrition, calcium for the bones, protein for the muscle and oils for the brain. We'll just give them IV packs like energy packs and be off and running as a matter of speaking.


Technorati Tags: ,

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Santa's Loot

Singaporean parents are often rightly and wrongly accused of trying to substitute gifts and toys for love and attention. The usual adage is children in Singapore are spoilt because their parents spoil them. Their parents spoil them because in lieu of time spent with them, they buy them gifts to 'bribe' them.

I've chanced upon another explanation for it. Having said this, I don't want to spoil my children, I don't want them turning out like rude brats. But I have the feeling that they will be very privileged because I'm such a sucker. Being away from them of course, makes me miss them. I look at photos on Facebook and videos on my phone as my way of keeping them in my mind. I don't SMS home or ring home because it costs too much and our child-minders always encourage to take the time to enjoy one another and not worry about the kids. So we don't ring home. Anyway, my other explanation for children being spoilt by gifts from their parents is this- they do it so that even when they are away from their kids, they're doing something for them. And it works on different levels. To make them feel less guilty, to make them feel that they are connecting, to help justify their being away (ok, the last one doesn't work for me but to each his own...)

So, the bulk of my shopping has been for the kids. I have enough clothes for them till they are 4 I think. They have enough clothes to fill an entire check-in luggage. Tops, bottoms, dresses, pjs. All very cute, all very cheap. Well, some of it belongs to their cousin but most of it is theirs. And are they out of clothes? Nope. Well, not really is. I think Evan is, but not Jordan because she gets hand-me-downs from her cousin. But Evan has pants which are too short for him and t-shirts which cannot be pulled over his head without eliciting panic from the boy when the t-shirt rim is caught on his forehead, especially when there is a bump there (and that is often).

We also found a playhouse for them, so we're carting that back too. Thankfully we've got a lot of weight allowance but are only allowed 4 bags. And the playhouse is taking the place of one bag. One bag belongs to them and their loot. So we have 2 bags for ourselves. One bag is for the dirty clothes that we have to bring back, so we're down to one bag. Packrat has declared a moratorium on shopping, also because he can't look at another store and is all shopped out but I keep thinking, we haven't done FAO Schwarz for them and so on. But I think even Santa's gonna have problems bringing them the loot we have for them here so I should stop.

Plus deep down inside, I know they really won't know that we bought them so much stuff. I think they'll just be happy that Papa and Ah Me are home. I know I will be. But I dread the flight. The long long flight. Can't we teleport the kids here?

Technorati Tags: ,

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

If the kids were here...

We miss the kids. No two ways about it. But then again, it's been great because we've actually managed to talk to one another and I've actually managed to get sleep, to the point that I've been sleeping 12 hours a stretch. Packrat is trying to convince me that I should just live for the day rather than think about what I left behind, especially since we will go back to them and we will be tired out by them again and feel run down again.

What makes me feel better is to imagine what I'd do if they were here. There's not much though, because it is Vegas. But there are roller coaster rides (although I convinced Packrat that Disneyland would be better for them) and all sorts of arcades. But one thing I figured they would like because I loved it and didn't want to leave, was FAO Schwarz. It's an amazing place.

It's 3 floors of toys. And real toys, not the mass produced plastic types that are definitely made in China. A lot of wood toys (my favourite) and a lot of toys that the kids can play with in the store without buying them. I'd heard so much about the toy store but it was my first time in and all I could think of was how we could probably leave them there and shop in the rest of the stores and they'd still be properly entertained. But that is assuming that I would feel safe leaving them alone there.

The other thing they would probably enjoy would have been the Lion Habitat at the MGM where we are staying. It's an enclosure within the casino and you can walk through it with the lions lying or stalking above our heads on what I'm hoping is shatter proof glass. The twins love animals and since they've discovered the tiger and how to roar like one, I'm sure they'd love these lions who play with raw hide pieces and exercise balls.

So, that's what I'd do with them if they were here. But since they aren't, all I can do is to shop for them. And shop I have and shop I will. Of course, I'm a cheapo and even at the outlets, I refuse to pay more than USD$15 for anything whether it is a pair of jeans or a pair of shoes. So, no Osh Kosh for them because even at outlets, they cost a lot and I'm not particularly fond of them. More shopping tomorrow. Thank goodness the kids aren't here to slow Mommy down.


Technorati Tags: , ,

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Switch off

I left the twins yesterday morning. Went into their room at 5 am to stroke their sleeping heads, stifled a sob and then left for the airport, all the while thinking about how I was going to miss Evan's throaty chuckles and Jordan's girlish giggle.

On the flight, Packrat intoned many times that I should start catching up on my sleep. And sleep I did, on the second leg, from Narita to LA. Singapore to Narita was impossible. But I kept drifting into semi-consciousness in my sleep and my thoughts would always be about whether I should give the kids water to drink because the cabin air was very dehydrating or whether I should feed them because I couldn't remember the last time I fed them. It really took some effort to remind myself that I wasn't with them.

Then, I asked Packrat whether he missed the twins. And he said no. I looked at him, ready to accuse him of being a bad father and he said he preferred to live in the here and the now. And since the twins weren't here and the point of the holiday was us, we should enjoy us. I asked him how and he said it was time to switch off. To switch from Mommy mode to wife mode.

Problem is, as proven with sex, men are like switches. ON. OFF. There's no in between. Women are different. There's a whole lot of warming up that has to be done. And I think it's going to take a while. My sis-in-law suggested I bring some of their clothes. Just like how we left some of our sleep clothes with the twins so that they would have our scent. Problem is, kids' clothes don't smell like the baby shampoo ads. They smell like sour milk and saliva. So when I opened the bag of tops I brought with me, it was like sniffing yogurt that had gone off. Nope, does nothing to soothe the Mommy and triggers the gag reflex instead.

I'm going to have to find my own binkie, my own way of being close to the twins while being away. But until then, I'm just going to watch their little vignettes on my phone and drive Packrat crazy.

Technorati Tags: ,

Friday, December 12, 2008

Revisiting Gina Ford

We're going away in a couple of hours to Las Vegas. And no, we're not bringing the kids, to answer the question that inadvertently follows the proclamation that we're off to the Sin City. It's going to be very hard for me. I've spent the last 2 weeks with the twins 24-7 and I'm going to have to go cold turkey. But we're going and have packed in some extra guilt and an overweight conscience. And since I've been doing all the child caring for the last fortnight, it's become necessary for me to record a schedule of what the twins do from day to day for those taking over so that there is minimal disruption to their routine. While writing it, I marvelled at how much they have grown and matured over the last weeks.

Daily Schedule for Evan and Jordan
7.15 am- Change to Bumwear and wash up. Diaper MUST be taken off.
7.30 am- Come down for breakfast (This is new. They used to wake up at 6 am and stay up.)
8.00 am- Bath.
No more morning nap. (This is in preparation for school next year and also because it's been inconsistent for the last two months and has made it difficult to plan outings.)
10.00 am- Milk
11.30 am- Lunch
1.00 pm- Nap (May or may not drink milk)
Should sleep for at least 2 hours. Might wake before that. Must put back to sleep. Room should be air-conditioned and blinds down. (This is great! They fall asleep more or less at the same time and it is actually a big enough block of time for me to do stuff, even though it still didn't open up enough time for me to blog.)
3.30-5.15 pm- Play and tea (Milk if milk hasn’t be drunk yet)
5.30 pm- Dinner
6.30 pm- Bath.
7.30 pm- Go to bed. Read books. Formula feed. (This is new too, also in preparation for when I finally get round to stop nursing. Unfortunately, Evan hates formula. He'll drink it but after showing me a lot of disgust and about 5 minutes worth of false starts).
Milk remainder to be warmed up and kept for Jordan later.
11.00 pm- Change to night diaper.
- Jordan might want milk.
2-4.00 am- One milk feed.
6.00 – 7.00 am – Morning milk feed. Allow children to go back to bed. (This works when their nattering is ignored)

So as part of their daily routine, I was lying by their beds this afternoon, waiting for them to pass out. But this afternoon, they were hopped up from something or other and took a good hour and a half to fall asleep. This meant a great amount of pretend sleeping on my part, as well as a bruised forehead. In a bid to get the attention of the sleeping Mommy, Evan lopped over his FULL bottle of milk, hitting me square in the forehead. In Tym's words, it automatically triggered the teacher voice. Thankfully, the boy had the decency not to chuckle or laugh; his usual reaction to any sort of chiding. Otherwise, the cranky, tired mommy would have been even more incensed.

And strangely enough, it's made me even more sad to leave and to already miss them. And also even more worried. Should I just be laissez faire about their routines and just let what happens happen? Or should I try to pre-empt everything and leave endless lists of instructions. As you can tell from the schedule, I went for the latter.

Technorati Tags: ,

Friday, December 05, 2008

Emotional Blackmail

Modern communicative technology has helped me keep in touch with Packrat in Vietnam. I've also it to emotionally blackmail Packrat into feeling bad for being away. I know it's not his fault and he wouldn't be if he didn't have to be but it's been a fun sending him messages from the twins knowing that it twangs him in the heart. I'm mean. I know. :)

So, with this picture, taken the morning he left...


"Good Morning Papa! We love you very much and we will miss you. Come home soon so that you can flip us upside down! Love, Evan and Jordan. "

And this was taken when we took Aunty A and Aunty J out to breakfast because it was Aunty A's birthday.

"Hello Papa! Mommy is giving us hotcakes! It is yummy but can you ask Mommy to give us more? Where are you Papa? MacDonald's isn't the same without you. Come home soon! Love, Jordan and Evan".

Simple messages which tug at the heart. But also so that Packrat can see what they are doing here and because they change even in the course of days.

Packrat comes back tomorrow night. I think the first thing he's going to do is to head into the twins' room and sniff their sleeping heads.

Technorati Tags: , ,

One word to rule them all

My little niece has a little bit of a speech delay because she spends so much time watching television she doesn't get much intellectual stimulation vocabulary and speech wise. We try very hard for our twins not to watch too much television for that and other reasons. It being the holidays and Packrat being away means the twins hang out with their cousin a lot. Her mom and I are convinced that she's convincing Baby J to be more reticent with words.

Once again, this seems to be where girls and boys differ. Baby J is very clear on words referring to people. "Papa" (Daddy), "Mama" (My mom and Godmama), "Ah Ma" (Packrat's Mom- the paternal Grandma), "Ah Me" (Mommy). Evan on the other hand loves naming objects. "Apple", "Cheese", "Dirty", "Ball", "Tata"( Traffic light) etc.

But try to get Jordan to name objects, that gets difficult. She utters a sound when you ask her to name the Apple or Tree but it doesn't sound right. It's just the same sound. Like her cousin. Ask Becca to name things, she goes "Ah-No!"

Conversation with a 17 month old

Mommy: Jordan, APPLE.
Jordan: Ko-wack!
Mommy: Jordan, A.P.P.L.E
Jordan: Ko-wack!
Mommy: Jordan, look there's WATER in the bottle
Jordan: Ko-wack!
Mommy: WATER
Jordan: Ko-wack!
Mommy: Jordan, say Ko-wack
Jordan: Ko-wack!
Mommy: Clever Girl!

Sigh...We used to think she was saying "Correct" but we're not really sure now. The trick now is to get her to say other sounds apart from the one word that rules them all. She knows what we're referring to. She knows how to follow instructions, so she understands. She just refuses to perform. Evan, on the other hand, loves parroting us. Every word. Which means I need to stop swearing at errant drivers.

So, what to do? Reward her like I did just now when she said "Eyes!" Though it sounded more like "Ice". Make a big deal out of it and try it out with other things. And ambitious me had to push it. Since we had "Eyes" down and I pointed out her nose.

Mommy: Jordan, this is your NOSE!
Jordan: Ko-wack!

Yup. We've got a long journey ahead.

Ko-wack.

Technorati Tags: ,

Tuesday, December 02, 2008

Single vs. single-parent

Packrat is away this week on a school trip so I'm holding down the fort on my own. And it's really on my own for real because my in laws are away as well. It's crazy trying to do everything all by myself. Even though I have 2 helpers to well, help, the whole episode with Aunty D has basically made me a paranoid-must-do-everything-by-myself mom. And with twins, it's a crazy merry go round. It got me thinking though about my friends, whose husbands travel and what they do when the men are away and how much things have changed with the kids.

Obviously, I'm aware that things have changed. I do, on occasion, wonder what things would be like had we not had the twins. And when I'm so exhausted from placating an extremely clingy daughter and feeling guilty about ignoring my mischievous son as a result, my mind does tend to wander.

So what am I doing now that Packrat is away?

  1. I am sleeping in the twins' room so that I don't have to traipse across every time one of them hollers for milk.By extension, for the first time in 16/17 years, I have to sleep in a single bed and sometimes with a fussy kid.
  2. I don't shower till lunch time rather than first thing in the morning like I usually do and I also don't get to express till much later.
  3. There's no such thing as alone time.
  4. I've had to throw out all the flyers informing me of private card member sales because I can't go.
  5. I've had to turn down invitations to see friends because I can't leave the children in the day nor at night. The best I did was slip out to buy fuel yesterday.
  6. I've also taken the kids swimming, to the park and various other places just so that I can wear them out and getting them to nap would be an easy thing, so that I can have lunch/bath/express/dinner (delete accordingly)
It's not that I'm hating it. I enjoy most of it except when Baby J is clingy and whiny because she knows her beloved Papa's not home. These 17 month old munchkins have associated my driving the car into the house with Packrat coming in after me and wait expectantly at the door when I walk in, waiting for "Papa" to come in.

But what would I do, if Packrat was away and I didn't have the twins? What would I do different, if all the time belonged to me? Disclaimer. I'm not wishing them away. It's just a bit of wishful thinking to get me through when I'm tired, exasperated and feeling sorry for myself.

So in my alternate universe where I don't have to and don't feel that I need to spend time with my kids (and not feel guilty about it), what would I be doing while my husband is away for work?

  1. I'd go to the spa- do my nails, a facial and a massage.
  2. I'd be at all the private sales that I've been invited to this week.
  3. I'd be having high tea with my friends.
  4. I'd be doing pilates every other day.
  5. I'd laze and read books and catch up on tv series.
  6. I'd try and arrange to go to some beach place to do 1., maybe part of 2. and 5 with girlfriends.
In short, I'd be living the tai-tai life that I'd always dreamed about and that have quietly been chipped away without my realising by the twins. I find different avenues of fulfillment now which I guess are more meaningful. But once a ditz, always a ditz and I was a ditz before I became a Mommy so my fantasies are mostly made up of brainless, non-intellectual pursuits especially because they are the furthest thing from reality at the moment.

I get a little bit of a breather tomorrow and I'd be ambitious to try and cramp 1. to 5. into it. Plus on a good day in reality, I still need to get work done. But since I've been inundated by Mommy duties, I actually do look forward to doing a bit of work and hopefully after that a spot of shopping or something just for me.

But I think at the end of the day, it's not much of a toss up. I don't really want to be either. I look forward to Packrat coming back during the weekend and I am thankful that he doesn't really travel all that often for work. I am thankful that this week is not the norm because I'd definitely lose my marbles, more weight and possibly be forced to stop breastfeeding out of sheer exhaustion and lack of time.

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Monday, December 01, 2008

Someone's gonna get hurt real bad

Tis the wedding season so I've been to a wedding a week the last couple of weeks and there's something that has struck me as bizarre. In two of the weddings, the newly married couple gave thank you speeches. No surprise there. They thanked everyone from God to the little boy who probably only opened their car down with a big grin and oranges in order to get some moolah. No surprise there too. What was surprising was the reason why they thanked particular people.

Parents fall into the "Must thank" category. If they are not thanked, that would be akin to slapping them in the face and spitting on their grave. So they get thanked. And in true Singapore fashion, these couples' thank you speeches seem to follow the composition answering template that was taught to them in primary school.

i.e.
Q: What fruit do you like?
A: I like apples.
Q: Why do you like apples?
A: I like apples because they are sweet and juicy.

Similarly, there were a lot of "I am thankful to my parents because..." and the reasons bordered on mundane and made me wonder if my kids would say the same thing about me years from now. There was thanking mom for making breakfast and thanking dad for sending/picking them to school/work. But there was one that did make me sit up. Thanking Dad (mostly) for disciplining them and being strict with them and caning them or making them do tons of assessment books.

It really sounded like a case of taking the whole Confucian thing a bit too far. I think our education has imbued into us that anything that disciplines us is good for us. And anything that builds character is good for us. So since discipline builds character, discipline must be good for us. But that's where it gets me. I'd be plenty ashamed if at Baby J (she won't be a baby by then...) or Evan's wedding that they stood and thanked us for disciplining them so that they grew up to become upstanding useful citizens. Discipline is very important, I agree with that. And it is part of loving our kids. I agree with that. But for it to be such a key feature of the relationship with my child such that it becomes the illustration that defines it, that's a bit too much of discipline and too little of everything else in the relationship. I don't know how the fathers felt, to be in the audience when this was announced to their 500 guests but I'd be quite ostrich like if it happened to me.

When I think back about what I'm thankful for with my Mom and Dad, I think about how my Mom would make it a point to book a holiday bungalow or chalet with us every year end vacation and we'd stay there for a week at a stretch. Our days revolved around being in the water or playing on the sand, occasionally coming up to eat. I even remember how one year, Mom booked it for the last week of the term because everything else was booked out and the thrill of going to school from the chalet was immense. It was like I had a secret and to be able to go "home" to the chalet after the school was way better than anything anyone must have had at that point. This was coupled by the fact that going to school meant playing games in school since it was after the exams. Now, that memory was something I am immensely thankful for and I look forward to being able to do the same thing for the twins.

With my Dad, he wasn't the most involved or enthused Dad around but he tried. And I remember how much he believed in my leadership abilities and how he took great offence at my not being selected to be a prefect. I'd come home crying because I found out that I hadn't been made prefect (I have no idea why it was such a big deal), not because I wasn't good enough but because my class had decided that Little Miss Good at Everything wasn't going to get away at being good at yet another thing. (The combined bitchiness of teenage girls and their elephant memories made for life in a girls school being extremely miserable for me) My Dad huffed and puffed about it and was about to march into the principal's office demanding how a girl's future (seriously?) could be determined by her impartial, immature peers and how it was obviously a flawed system. Thankfully, he heard me when I begged him not to make my life more miserable. I found out later on that he did the same thing for my brother. Dad had something about making sure that we were given the leadership opportunities we deserved and even though there wasn't direct discipline involved, it taught us another virtue, as important as discipline and that was justice and objectivity.

Oh! It just struck me that being a prefect was a big deal because my brothers had been prefects and had served on the prefectorial boards and I got a kick out of them wearing school blazers. I think that and the idea of head girls put into my head by Enid Blyton and all her school stories! But that's beside the point. My point was that those are the things I remember my parents doing for me and while they didn't directly build character like the cane would have, they made me feel loved and protected.

And in my book, growing up with a childhood memories that do not involve school work or tuition and knowing that my parents had my back are as important as being taught right from wrong. But at the same time, don't get me wrong. My parents were big on discipline. Especially Dad. His oft bellowed threat was something about turning us upside down and walloping us. So much so that I recorded it verbatim in a composition I wrote for the school news letter and the principal called me in for questioning, on whether I was really subject to such cruel and ununsual punishment that bordered on abuse.

But I don't remember the overt acts of discipline even though I know they were there and they make me part of who I am now. And I don't want my kids to remember the times that I smack/ ground/ rail at them, especially not at their weddings!

Technorati Tags: , , ,